In November, the Queensland government introduced a bill which would mean advertisers, such as Wicked Campers, would be required to remove offensive slogans and images or risk having their vehicles de-registered.

Once the vehicles were de-registered, the vehicles would not be allowed to be used on the roads until the offensive advertising was removed.

While many groups applauded the move, others called for stricter rules for other businesses.

Feminist group Wicked Pickets supported the bill but said there was a "great deal more public misogyny used by commercial organisations".

"[It also] denigrates women and girls, for example the advertising of some clothing companies and nightclubs," the submission reads.

"They objectify women, they sometimes promote rape as a glamorous act. The bill as written will not challenge this advertising.

"All businesses which use misogynistic slogans must be held accountable for the harm they are causing to women and girls."

Wicked Pickets argued the "right" to vilify women and girls was not about free speech.

Christine King, who had previously created a petition over offensive advertising on vans, said there was a wider issue of portrayal of women in advertising and the hyper-sexualisation of children, including lingerie in the front windows of stores in shopping centres and offensive slogans on other products.

"There continues to be large loopholes that make it difficult to get action taken," she wrote.

Ms King called for the Advertising Standards Bureau to be given powers to impose fines for non-vehicle breaches of advertising, particularly for those that denigrated women or were on display to children.

She also called for a review of Queensland's public indecency laws.

"[They] seem inadequate to deal with public obscenity cases such as the use of foul language or degrading images display on private property in shops, on T-shirts and on merchandise where it is easily viewed by minors or the general public," Ms King wrote.

Queensland Law Society former president Bill Potts said the QLS was deeply concerned the bill would remove the right of the registered operator to ask for a review or appeal of a decision.

Mr Potts said the bill attempted to justify the section by arguing the chief executive would only make a decision after the ASB's process, including any review, had been finalised, and outlined the rights of review under the process.

"However, we believe this is insufficient as it does not afford the registered operator any review rights in respect of the subject decision made under this legislation," Mr Potts wrote.

Mr Potts also said it was inappropriate for Parliament to legislate to "oust the jurisdiction of the court".

FamilyVoice Australia welcomed the bill and said it was long overdue.

"For too long, parents have been unable to protect their children from offensive advertisements displayed on other vehicles," the submission said.

But FamilyVoice was concerned an advertisement on a car in support of heterosexual marriage and families could be subjected to an adverse finding by the ASB.

"To mitigate the risk to freedom of political communication, the bill should be amended to make clear that only adverse findings by the ASB with respect to sexually explicit and obscene advertisements are covered by the legislation," FamilyVoice wrote.

Australian Christian Lobby Queensland state director Wendy Francis said all outdoor advertising should be G-rated, appropriate for children to view and free from sexualised images and messages.

Another submitter, Alvar Dalton, said he was opposed to the changes as he disagreed with infringements on free speech, arguing "offensive" was subjective.

ASB chief executive officer Fiona Jolly said most advertising and marketing in Australia complied with the codes and did not receive complaints, while the majority of those complained about were not in breach of the codes.

"Where a breach is found, the bureau has a record of more than 97 per cent compliance by industry with standards board determinations over the past five years," Ms Jolly wrote.

Several submitters called for similar laws in other states and territories, to prevent vehicles from being registered elsewhere.

The bill attracted 11 submissions, with the Transportation and Utilities Committee due to report by February 2.