For months, Mr Pyne has been using the protections against legal action afforded by the Parliament to table pages of documents.

He had planned to table more documents on Thursday relating to a domestic violence case.

It comes after Mr Wellington issued a stern warning about a "very grave" breach of security on Wednesday, when Mr Pyne signed accused stalker Petros Khalesirad into the parliamentary precinct and allegedly left him unattended.

Mr Khalesirad was set to front court in December after pleading not guilty to a charge of stalking the member for Keppel, Brittany Lauga.

Speaking to ABC radio in Rockhampton, Ms Lauga said she was concerned about security at the Parliament.

"I think that Parliament House is also a workplace, so people who come to work at Parliament House, whether it be members of Parliament, whether it be staff of the parliamentary precinct, should be able to feel safe when they're working there," she said.

On Thursday morning, Mr Wellington referred the incident of Mr Khalesirad's access to Parliament to the ethics committee.

"I take breaches of our security procedures very seriously because of the potential risk posed to members, staff and the public," he said.

"There was a prima facie breach of security procedure.

"Further examination of the facts are required ... This matter involves wider issues of policy including what sanctions are appropriate to be instituted against members for failing to follow security procedures whilst also taking into account the rights of members."

However, Mr Pyne said Mr Khalesirad's behaviour in the Parliament was "exemplary".

"I must say that of all the guests I have had to Parliament House, none have been better behaved than Mr Khalesirad," Mr Pyne said in a statement.

He suggested the issue could be an "ALP distraction to muddy the waters".

However opening Parliament for the day, Mr Wellington delivered a withering assessment of the use of parliamentary privilege to table documents, stopping short of naming the Cairns MP.

Mr Wellington said the Queensland Parliament was very "liberal" and members had an "almost unfettered right to table documents, at least in the first instance".

"I have become increasingly concerned about the unfettered right to table documents, which I believe is open to abuse," he said.

"On an increasing basis, reams of material are being tabled ... Which then falls on the clerk and his officers to ensure (the documents) do not breach standing orders.

"This material often includes matters which offends standing orders, material is then either not tabled or redacted."

Mr Wellington said some "fetter" or accountability may be necessary because of the frequency and nature of the tabling.

"It appears we can no longer rely on members to self-regulate the right to table material," he said.

But he said there was no suggestion members' freedom of speech would be impinged.

"I'm not talking about freedom of speech. I'm talking about the ability to table anything a member wants to table as long as it does not offend rules such as the sub judice or reflections on other members," Mr Wellington said.

The Speaker referred the issue to the Committee of the Legislative Assembly and invited MPs to make submissions.